When I left the world of broadcast news and joined BevNET/Nosh nearly two years ago, I quickly established myself as the edit team’s resident sugar fiend. While that title has been an honor, I’ve recently found myself – like 75% of American consumers – trying to lower my sugar intake (gasp) while pursuing a healthier lifestyle. 🍬 But that feat is easier said than done. There’s no sugarcoating the fact that excessive sugar consumption can lead to health issues like obesity, diabetes, and heart problems – but there’s also nothing quite like the sugar high of tearing open a bag of your favorite nostalgic candy. Are better-for-you (BFY) sweets the solution? ⏪ I grew up in a family where candy wasn’t a once-in-a-while treat or a permissible indulgence, it was a snack. In some cases, it was even a meal – with my late Papa often consuming Tootsie Rolls or Bulls-Eyes for breakfast. What can I say? It’s in my DNA. 🧬Scientists at 23 & Me, a direct-to-consumer genetic testing company, have identified 43 genetic markers (DNA locations) associated with a preference for sweet or salty snacks. The confectionery industry at large has seen a significant shift over the past few years, with more and more BFY options cropping up – like Joyride, Snack Owl, and Better Sour – alongside conventional offerings. These products follow in the footsteps of pioneers like Justin’s and SmartSweets, who proved healthier alternatives to popular candies could, in fact, go mainstream. They’ve also benefited from a marketplace receptive to their approach. Mainstream retailers are beginning to catch on, with Target recently onboarding Better Sour and Rotten getting picked up by select Foxtrot and Hy-Vee stores. Meanwhile, the reverberating impact of appetite-suppressing GLP-1 drugs and allulose – a naturally occurring simple sugar used to sweeten BFY candies like SmartSweets, Small Wins, BEHAVE and Lily’s that has a similar satiety effect to Ozempic – teases the prospect of more innovation to come. But, there are two primary deterrents preventing me from replacing my beloved Sour Patch Kids with BFY iterations: taste and price point. 😝 In order to stamp a “low sugar” or “zero sugar” callout on front-of-pack labeling, some candy brands have turned to low or no-calorie sweeteners (LNCS) or sugar alcohols, which often leave behind an unpleasant aftertaste. Personally, I’d like to see BFY brands formulate with low doses of cane sugar or not-so-terrible-tasting sweeteners such as the aforementioned allulose. 🤑 Low-sugar and sugar-free candies tend to come with a heftier price tag than their traditional counterparts, likely due to their more natural, premium ingredients. Recently, I found myself choosing between a 3.6 oz. bag of Sour Patch Kids Watermelon that retails for $1.29 and a 1.8 oz. bag of SmartSweet’s Sourmelon Bites that costs $3.29. For me to pick the healthier, more expensive option, the taste needs to be nearly identical to the product’s conventional counterpart, though I realize that may be a lot to ask. I do believe that BFY candy has the potential to cure America’s insatiable sweet tooth and achieve mainstream adoption, but there’s plenty of room for improvement in terms of sustainability, taste and price point. I’m excited to see what’s next in the making of Candyland 2.0. Shauna Golden (sgolden@bevnet.com) is the editorial assistant for BevNET/Nosh. |