The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has gone sour on promotions for alt-sweetener aspartame. This week, the agency sent warning letters to 12 registered dietician-influencers as well as the American Beverage Association (AmeriBev) and The Canadian Sugar Institute for misleading consumers about the origins of their aspartame-promoting social media posts. What happened? The influencers did not provide “adequate disclosures” and failed to identify that these were paid promotions sponsored by AmeriBev and The Canadian Sugar Institute. - The FTC’s Disclosures 101 for Social Media Influencers (sounds straightforward) instructs that posts must state any financial relationships tied to a specific message or video.
- That disclosure should be in both the video or image as well as in the text description.
A simple #Ad is all they are asking for here. If these influencers continue failing to heed FTC warnings, they could face penalties of up to $50,000 per violation. While this serves as a reminder to all who utilize paid social media promotions, the recently revived debate around the safety of aspartame was certainly a key factor. These letters also follow a joint investigative story published by The Washington Post and The Examination that found lobbying groups were paying dieticians to promote low and no sugar substitutes. Those efforts were attempts to counter the World Health Organization’s June report that named the ingredient a “possible carcinogen,” the story claims. Though the FTC has signaled an intent to crack down on misleading information on social media, the WaPo-Examination story explains that the agency has inadequate resources to properly enforce its mandates. 🔥More fuel on the fire: The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics also maintains a code of ethics for its members (in line with the FTC’s Disclosures 101) regarding social media promotions. But the group has received millions in donations from multinational beverage, candy and food companies – further blurring the lines between conflicts of interest. 💭“It’s irresponsible for any trade group to hire influencers to tout its members’ products and fail to ensure that the influencers come clean about that relationship,” said Samuel Levine, director of the FTC’s Bureau of Consumer Protection. Learn how the industry initially reacted to the WHO’s aspartame assessment on NOSH. |