What’s good for MAHA may not be so nice for Big CSD. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is moving quickly to approve state requests to pull soda and candy from the Supplemental Food Assistance Program (SNAP), the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday. Arkansas and Indiana are the first two to follow Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s lead, asking the USDA to prohibit SNAP recipients from purchasing sugary goods with their benefits. While the exact list of impacted products isn’t yet known, it would appear that “Diet” sodas are going to be on the chopping block. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders put the new policy succinctly in an interview with the Journal: “No one is saying you can’t have a Diet Coke or a candy bar. We’re saying you can’t do it with taxpayer money.” These are big, early policy wins for Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement – which has been integrating itself into CPG industry, even making an appearance at this year’s Expo West – they’re not alone in using government levers to push for healthier eating and drinking habits. Those old classic local ordinances known as Soda Taxes seem to be coming back in style as well. In January, Boston city councilors began advocating for a new sugary drinks tax and just this week, Connecticut legislators took up a bill that would impose a statewide soda tax. If passed, the Connecticut bill would become the country’s first sugary drinks tax covering an entire state, rather than just a municipality. Maryland state legislators just nixed the addition of a B2B service and sugary drink tax to its fiscal year 2026 budget in March. With candy also in the crosshairs, Arkansas and Indiana’s SNAP move is also an extension of MAHA’s crusade against ultraprocessed foods (UPFs). These prohibitions could be a preview of how beverages will be roped into the push to reduce consumption of artificial and processed foods in America. Unsurprisingly, manufacturers aren’t pleased with all of this. Industry group American Beverage called the policies “misguided,” per WSJ, and said they “won’t make an ounce of difference on health.” But a per ounce tax on sodas might make a difference on sales. Go Deeper: The Food Industry’s Approach To UPFs |